PredictionBook is now read-only ( read more ).

The Republicans will repeal the ACA by November 2015. *I'm going to withdraw this prediction as I wasn't thinking that the Republicans do not hold enough seats to override a presidential veto.

Created by ren on 2014-11-11; known on 2015-11-08; judged wrong by NathanMcKnight on 2015-11-04.

  • ren estimated 90% on 2014-11-11
  • JoshuaZ estimated 15% on 2014-11-11
  • Bill_Stickers estimated 95% on 2014-11-12
  • tylercurtis estimated 10% on 2014-11-14
  • JoshuaZ said “To people estimating high percentages. I don’t understand: Are you counting a bill passed repealing it that then gets vetoed as a correct for this? If not, where are your high percentages coming from? on 2014-11-14
  • NathanMcKnight estimated 0% and said “Not a chance. They’ll get a bill through the House, but not the Senate, and even if they did—say, by eliminating the filibuster (which would be a bad move on their part), obviously it would be vetoed.on 2014-11-14
  • sweeneyrod estimated 5% on 2014-11-14
  • HonoreDB estimated 1% and said “Yeah, I don’t see how this can happen.on 2014-11-14
  • Jayson Virissimo estimated 20% and said “‘Repealed’ isn’t that clear cut. How big a change does it have to be to consider it to have been repealed. What if everything stays the same, but not more penalty/tax. Is that still ‘repealed’?on 2014-11-17
  • ren changed the deadline from “on 2015-11-08” and changed their prediction from “The Republicans will repeal the ACA by November 2015.” on 2014-11-19
  • Jayson Virissimo said “If the Republican don’t repeal the ACA because they don’t have enough seats to override a Presidential veto, the correct response would be to judge this false (when the time comes), not withdraw it.on 2014-11-21
  • kuudes said “I concur with Jayson Virissimo’s suggestion. I do not see changing or withdrawing the prediction as a prudent course of action in the described case.on 2014-11-24
  • JoshuaZ said “Agree with Jayson and Kuudes. That one can give a high probability to something which obviously is wrong when one has additional details is something one should keep in mind. It is relevant if one is trying to calibrate. on 2014-12-05
  • David estimated 1% on 2015-07-19
  • David estimated 0% on 2015-10-25
  • NathanMcKnight   judged this prediction wrong on 2015-11-04.